Your Browser is not longer supported

Please use Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox or Microsoft Edge to view the page correctly
Loading...

{{viewport.spaceProperty.prod}}

Beispiele zu BCHECK

&pagelevel(3)&pagelevel

Die Datenbank KUNDEN (siehe "Beispieldatenbanken") wurde umstrukturiert und sieht danach folgendermaßen aus:

Bild 9: Datenbank KUNDEN nach dem Umstrukturieren

Nachdem einige Zeit mit der umstrukturierten Datenbank KUNDEN gearbeitet wurde, soll sie mit BCHECK auf Konsistenz geprüft werden. Folgende Stände existieren:

  • Schattendatenbank unmittelbar nach dem Umstrukturieren: copyname.NACHUM

  • Originaldatenbank (neuerer Stand als NACHUM)

Beispiel 1

Die Schattendatenbank wird nach dem Umstrukturieren (NACHUM) komplett summarisch geprüft.

/ADD-FILE-LINK LINK-NAME=DATABASE,FILE-NAME=KUNDEN.DBDIR.NACHUM
/SELECT-PRODUCT-VERSION PRODUCT-NAME=UDS-SQL,    VERSION=02.9A00
/START-UDS-BCHECK
***** START       BCHECK      (UDS/SQL  V2.9  0000 )     2017-06-28   11:25:59
CHECK SUMMING
SCHEMA KUNDENKARTEI
REALM ALL
RECORD ALL
SET ALL WITH INDEX CHECK
KEY ALL WITH INDEX CHECK
END
***** FOR INDEX CHECKS A SORTING MUST BE PERFORMED EVEN FOR THE SUMMING
      PROCEDURE

***** THE INPUT IS CORRECT, THE CHECK RUN IS STARTING NOW
***** ANALYSING NEW STATE OF REALM KUNDENRLM FROM FILE
     :SQL2:$XXXXXXXX.KUNDEN.KUNDENRLM.NACHUM
           100 NON EMPTY PAGES HAVE BEEN ANALYSED
***** ANALYSING NEW STATE OF REALM FINANZRLM FROM FILE
     :SQL2:$XXXXXXXX.KUNDEN.FINANZRLM.NACHUM
             6 NON EMPTY PAGES HAVE BEEN ANALYSED
***** SORTING   STARTED      DATE AND TIME  2017-06-28  11:25:59
***** SORTING COMPLETED      DATE AND TIME  2017-06-28  11:25:59

***** DIAGNOSTIC SUMMARY OF BCHECK

             NO WARNINGS
             NO ERRORS
             NO SYSTEM-ERRORS

           11379 LOCAL CHECKS HAVE BEEN DONE
            126 RECORD/TABLE-OCCURRENCES HAVE BEEN CHECKED AGAINST DBTT
             68 CHAIN-SET-MEMBERSHIPS HAVE BEEN CHECKED
             52 REFERENCES BETWEEN TABLE-OCCURRENCES HAVE BEEN CHECKED
             72 REFERENCES FROM TABLES TO MEMBER-RECORDS HAVE BEEN CHECKED
             72 USERKEYS BETWEEN TABLES AND MEMBER-RECORDS HAVE BEEN CHECKED

             NO EASY (MINOR) LOCAL CONSISTENCY ERRORS
             NO FATAL (SERIOUS, STRUCTURAL) LOCAL CONSISTENCY ERRORS

             NO GLOBAL CONSISTENCY ERRORS
             NO GLOBAL INDEX CHECK HAS BEEN DONE

***** END OF DIAGNOSTIC SUMMARY
***** NR OF DATABASE ACCESSES  :          26
***** NORMAL END   BCHECK      (UDS/SQL  V2.9  0000 )     2017-06-28   11:25:59


Beispiel 2

Die Originaldatenbank wird gegen die laut BCHECK-Prüflauf fehlerfreie Schattendatenbank nach der Umstrukturierung (NACHUM) geprüft. Bei dieser summarischen Inkrementalprüfung prüft BCHECK beide Datenbanken auch auf Kohärenz.

/ADD-FILE-LINK LINK-NAME=DATABASE,FILE-NAME=KUNDEN.DBDIR
/SELECT-PRODUCT-VERSION PRODUCT-NAME=UDS-SQL,VERSION=02.9A00
/START-UDS-BCHECK
***** START       BCHECK      (UDS/SQL  V2.9  0000 )     2017-06-28   11:36:10
CHECK SUMMING AGAINST COPY NAME NACHUM
SCHEMA KUNDENKARTEI
REALM ALL
RECORD ALL
SET ALL
KEY ALL
END

***** THE INPUT IS CORRECT, THE CHECK RUN IS STARTING NOW
***** ANALYSING NEW STATE OF REALM KUNDENRLM FROM FILE
     :SQL2:$XXXXXXXX.KUNDEN.KUNDENRLM
     AGAINST OLD STATE FROM FILE :SQL2:$XXXXXXXX.KUNDEN.KUNDENRLM.NACHUM
            50 CHANGED PAGES HAVE BEEN ANALYSED
***** ANALYSING NEW STATE OF REALM FINANZRLM FROM FILE
     :SQL2:$XXXXXXXX.KUNDEN.FINANZRLM
     AGAINST OLD STATE FROM FILE :SQL2:$XXXXXXXX.KUNDEN.FINANZRLM.NACHUM
             2 CHANGED PAGES HAVE BEEN ANALYSED

+++++ GLOBAL CONSISTENCY ERRORS IN TYPE-NR :          1

+++++ GLOBAL CONSISTENCY ERRORS IN REF-NR  :          2

***** DIAGNOSTIC SUMMARY OF BCHECK

             NO WARNINGS
             NO ERRORS
             NO SYSTEM-ERRORS

           14474 LOCAL CHECKS HAVE BEEN DONE
            246 RECORD/TABLE-OCCURRENCES HAVE BEEN CHECKED AGAINST DBTT
            136 CHAIN-SET-MEMBERSHIPS HAVE BEEN CHECKED
            102 REFERENCES BETWEEN TABLE-OCCURRENCES HAVE BEEN CHECKED
            144 REFERENCES FROM TABLES TO MEMBER-RECORDS HAVE BEEN CHECKED
            144 USERKEYS BETWEEN TABLES AND MEMBER-RECORDS HAVE BEEN CHECKED

             NO EASY (MINOR) LOCAL CONSISTENCY ERRORS
             NO FATAL (SERIOUS, STRUCTURAL) LOCAL CONSISTENCY ERRORS

+++++            GLOBAL CONSISTENCY ERRORS. DO A SORTING CHECK
             NO GLOBAL INDEX CHECK HAS BEEN DONE

***** END OF DIAGNOSTIC SUMMARY
***** NR OF DATABASE ACCESSES  :          48
***** NORMAL END   BCHECK      (UDS/SQL  V2.9  0000 )     2017-06-28   11:36:10

Ausschnitte aus dem SYSLST-Protokoll:

.
.
/REMARK   START GENERATED BCHECK-STATEMENTS
/ADD-FILE-LINK LINK-NAME=BCHECK,                                       -
/   FILE-NAME=$XXXXXXXX.UTI.1DP5.30125022.BCHECK
/ADD-FILE-LINK LINK-NAME=DATABASE,                                     -
/   FILE-NAME=$XXXXXXXX.KUNDEN.DBDIR
/SELECT-PRODUCT-VERSION PRODUCT-NAME=UDS-SQL,VERSION=XX.XXXX
/SET-JV-LINK LINK-NAME=UDSPS01,JV-NAME=UDS-PUB-DECL
/START-UDS-BCHECK
CHECK GENERATE SORTING AGAINST COPY NACHUM
TYPE        IS  1
SCHEMA NAME IS KUNDENKARTEI
REALM  NAME IS KUNDENRLM
REALM  NAME IS FINANZRLM
RECORD NAME IS KUNDE                           WITH    LOCATION CHECK
SET    NAME IS GEWAEHRTE-KREDITE               WITHOUT INDEX    CHECK
KEY    REF  IS    1                            WITHOUT INDEX    CHECK
END
.
.
.


Nachdem in der summarischen Prüfung Fehler festgestellt wurden, werden diese mit einer Sortierprüfung lokalisiert. Die Anweisungsfolge für eine eingeschränkte Sortierprüfung ist in der SYSLST-Ausgabe der summarischen Prüfung nach REMARK... aufgeführt.

Beispiel 3

Es wird eine eingeschränkte Sortierprüfung durchgeführt, um die Fehler genauer zu lokalisieren. Dazu werden die Anweisungen verwendet, die im Protokoll der summarischen Prüfung nach REMARK... aufgeführt sind.

/ADD-FILE-LINK  BCHECK, $XXXXXXXX.UTI.1DP5.30125022.BCHECK
/ADD-FILE-LINK LINK-NAME=DATABASE,FILE-NAME=KUNDEN.DBDIR
/SELECT-PRODUCT-VERSION PRODUCT-NAME=UDS-SQL,VERSION=02.9A00
/SET-JV-LINK LINK-NAME=UDSPS01,JV-NAME=UDS-PUB-DECL
/START-UDS-BCHECK
***** START       BCHECK      (UDS/SQL  V2.9  0000 )     2017-06-28   11:36:10
CHECK GENERATE SORTING AGAINST COPY NACHUM
TYPE       IS  1
SCHEMA NAME IS KUNDENKARTEI
REALM  NAME IS KUNDENRLM
REALM  NAME IS FINANZRLM
RECORD NAME IS KUNDE                     WITH    LOCATION CHECK
SET    NAME IS GEWAEHRTE-KREDITE           WITHOUT INDEX    CHECK
KEY    REF  IS    1                      WITHOUT INDEX    CHECK
END

***** THE INPUT IS CORRECT, THE CHECK RUN IS STARTING NOW.
***** ANALYSING NEW STATE OF REALM KUNDENRLM FROM FILE
     :SQL2:$XXXXXXXX.KUNDEN.KUNDENRLM
     AGAINST OLD STATE FROM FILE :SQL2:$XXXXXXXX.KUNDEN.KUNDENRLM.NACHUM
            50 CHANGED BLOCKS HAVE BEEN ANALYSED.
***** ANALYSING NEW STATE OF REALM FINANZRLM FROM FILE
     :SQL2:$XXXXXXXX.KUNDEN.FINANZRLM
     AGAINST OLD STATE FROM FILE :SQL2:$XXXXXXXX.KUNDEN.FINANZRLM.NACHUM
             2 CHANGED BLOCKS HAVE BEEN ANALYSED.
.
.
.
***** DIAGNOSTIC SUMMARY OF BCHECK

             NO WARNINGS
             NO ERRORS
             NO SYSTEM-ERRORS

           10062 LOCAL CHECKS HAVE BEEN DONE
            144 RECORD/TABLE-OCCURRENCES HAVE BEEN CHECKED AGAINST DBTT
              0 CHAIN-SET-MEMBERSHIPS HAVE BEEN CHECKED
              0 REFERENCES BETWEEN TABLE-OCCURRENCES HAVE BEEN CHECKED
              0 REFERENCES FROM TABLES TO MEMBER-RECORDS HAVE BEEN CHECKED

             NO EASY (MINOR) LOCAL CONSISTENCY ERRORS
             NO FATAL (SERIOUS, STRUCTURAL) LOCAL CONSISTENCY ERRORS

+++++          1 GLOBAL CONSISTENCY ERRORS

***** END OF DIAGNOSTIC SUMMARY
***** NR OF DATABASE ACCESSES  :          67
***** NORMAL END   BCHECK      (UDS/SQL  V2.9  0000 )     2017-06-28   11:36:10

Ausschnitte aus dem SYSLST-Protokoll:

.
.
.
***** THE FOLLOWING CHANGE OF DATABASE IS NOT CONSISTENT
CHECK ELEMENT : 0002 00000021 0002 FFFF 03000066 01 00 0000 00000000
FOR OWNER-DBKEY 0002-000000000021 DBTT-COL 2
        A TABLE-OCCURRENCE AT TABLE-LEVEL MAX. WAS ADDED TO PAGE 03000066
        WITH NO CORRESPONDING CHANGE OF THE REFERENCE IN THE DBTT.
.
.
.